Jiangxi: illegal sequestration of 60 million veterans Financial Officer convicted _ News Channel Network _ _ Chinese accounting perspective needed to accountants - CPA | Certified Tax | Accounting titles | Senior Accountant | Accounting practitioners

Original title: illegal 6 million companies and veterans Are guilty Author: Huang An Jiang Huang Recently (July 25), County People 's Court first instance to illegally absorb the public Sentenced the defendant unit a car sales company fined 60,000 yuan, sentenced to the company Zhang imprisonment for three years, suspended for four years, and fined 50,000 yuan, sentenced to the company Director Xu imprisonment for six months a year, suspended for two years, and fined 20,000 yuan. After investigation, a car sales company in December 2006 registered the establishment of a major brand of auto and accessories sales, registered capital of 20 million yuan, Zhang as a legal representative, Xu Mou (female) as the company's chief financial officer. In 2009, the company became 4S shop, the required funds continue to increase, Zhang is difficult to raise, then to expand the company's production needs turnover funds, Loans and other reasons, promised to pay the monthly interest rate of two points, three points or even higher interest to raise funds to the public, the use of word of mouth and intercourse, etc., has more than 60 people to absorb funds, by Xu responsible for unit loans statistics and interest payments , And provide security. Identified by 2016 , The company illegally absorbs public deposits involving more than 60 people, a total of 6292 million yuan of deposits, of which the amount is not returned 1393 million yuan. July 2015, the public security organs received a report to the victim after the investigation, Zhang took the initiative to the public security organs to verify the situation, in August the same year and Xu to the public security organs to be investigated and criminal detention, after the case of two truthfully confessed to crime The After the first instance verdict, the defendant unit and the defendants are not appealing.