Huang Qifan proposed to reduce the maximum tax rate of wages in a tax - Trade News-21tradenet.com, global trading platform and stock buy leads My business card My mobile shop My Simple Chinese shop My Traditional Chinese shop home> Supply>

morning, On behalf of the NPC Financial and Economic Committee Vice Chairman Huang Qifan in the consideration of the financial When the report is recommended, will The highest margin From 45% to 25%. Huang Qifan that the recent personal income tax reform on the hot, is generally recommended to improve Or from synthesis and classification Point of view, but he believes that it is imperative to reduce the maximum tax rate for personal income tax. NPC deputies and vice chairman of the NPC Financial and Economic Committee Huang Qifan made speeches at the group council Huang Qifan said that China's personal income tax levied in 1980, the implementation of the classification tax system, to take excess versus Combined with the way to levy, wages and salaries for the excess Rate of 5% -45%, dividend dividends and other capital for the proportion of tax rate of 20%. Although these years to improve the threshold, adjust the tax rate level and other improvements, but with the current The level of development, residents Way changes and other new situation has not adapted. At present, I am In the study of the promotion of comprehensive and classified personal income tax system, but because of social information sharing is not high, personal income tax database construction slow and other reasons, the operation will take time. In this case, reducing the maximum marginal tax rate of personal income tax can produce immediate results, the biggest advantage is that it will not increase , Will not damage the individual interests, resistance is small, easy to operate, both to "Yang Tang only boiling", but also help "drastic", do both. Huang Qifan that deepening the reform to adhere to the problem-oriented, goal-oriented. At present, the most prominent issue of personal income tax is the maximum wage rate of 45% of wage earners. With the surrounding than, Only 15% For 22%; compared with developing countries, only 13% in Russia, 27.5% in Brazil; Country than For 33% Was 39.6%. These countries or regions are not only lower than our country, and pre-tax deduction many, Buy a house, mortgage interest, children tuition, medical treatment, maintenance and other items can be deducted about half of the deduction. For example, the data show that the United States 39.6% tax rate after the deduction, the final burden of the actual tax rate of about 25%. China's personal income tax this high tax rate, at least bring four aspects of harm. First, working-class, especially professional and technical personnel, due to a single source of income, By the unit withholding and become the main income tax personal income, the proportion has risen to about 70%, while the US personal income tax of about 70% from 10% of high-income earners. In contrast, China's high-income groups Motives are very strong, a lot of ways, such as "work in the mainland, wages overseas" or "money in the enterprise, do not get wages" and other ways to avoid tax. Therefore, the high tax rate did not give us a corresponding high tax. Last year, China's personal income tax accounted for 7.7% of the total tax, far below the developed countries 30%, developing countries around 15% level. Second is not conducive to attract and gather high-quality talent. At present, China's talent supply and demand structure imbalance, high-skilled, high-level talent shortage. Attract high-end talent, speed up To the talent dividend change, need a good tax environment. Many multinational companies are in More than half of its revenue from China, but most of its Asia-Pacific headquarters in Hong Kong, Singapore, one of the main reasons is that China's personal income tax rate is too high to reach neighboring countries or regions more than twice, but also no reasonable Policy, making a lot of business and professional talent discouraged. Third, the suppression of consumer spending. Working-class marginal propensity to consume high, most of the consumption in the country, to its own brand-based, is the main force driving domestic demand. Too high personal income tax rate, micro is not conducive to expanding consumer spending, restricting consumption upgrades, macro is not conducive to the growth of middle-income groups. Four is not conducive to narrowing the gap between rich and poor. Personal income tax has an adjustment of income distribution function. China's system at the beginning of the establishment of the national average monthly wage of workers only 63.5, the average person can not reach the threshold of 800 tax rates, according to 45% tax rate to pay a handful of policy Very obvious. Now, "adjust the tone can not be extended, not to expand," is equal to the poor for the rich "pocket." To this end, Huang Qifan proposed to reduce the personal income tax in the maximum wage rate, from 45% to 25%, as a combination of personal income tax to promote the combination of reform and classification of the breakthrough. Reduce the maximum wage rate of wages, naturally led to the reduction of tax rate level, but also with the capital Rate, but also help to improve the community's compliance with the tax, reduce the difficulty of supervision, improve the effectiveness of supervision for the future implementation of personal income tax reform to facilitate.