Crone environment-related letter Phi violations are reported as a false announcement News Channel _ _ _ China accounting perspective network required to accountants - CPA | Certified Tax | Accounting titles | Senior Accountant | Accounting practitioners

A short few hundred words of the announcement, but by the company executives directed at multiple content and Does not match This strange "oolong event" occurred in the listed company financial environment (300,152, SZ) who. Night, the financial environment of a The provisional resolution announcement states that "the supervisor of the company, senior Personnel reviewed the meeting bill. "However, the company Chairman Wang Yu Gang is high-profile sound "I did not receive the notice of the Board of Directors and the relevant plan, the contents of the announcement and the facts do not match." At the same time, the announcement of the so-called "director Zheng Jun did not attend the meeting due to work reasons", Zheng Zheng was confirmed as false content, Zheng statement "I am today ( ) Was informed that the financial environment held a temporary board of directors notice. The "Oolong incident" behind in the end what hidden? Whether the financial environment is suspected Violation In this regard, "every day News "reporter conducted a survey. It is noteworthy that, on September 11, Exclusive coverage of the financial environment suspected of the letter after the violation of the matter, the day the Shenzhen Stock Exchange The company management department requires the financial environment to explain the relevant statement and in Before the relevant information submitted to the Shenzhen Stock Exchange. On the evening of September 10, the "Notice of Resolutions of the 41st Meeting of the Third Board of Directors (Temporary)" (hereinafter referred to as the Announcement) was promulgated. First of all, the notice marked in a prominent position: the Company and all members of the Board to ensure that the content of information disclosure is true, accurate and complete, there is no false record, misleading statements or major omissions. Secondly, the contents of this announcement is only one, for the appointment The person in charge of the motion. According to the company chairman and general manager It is recommended that Liu Dazhi be the head of the company. The final vote for the 5 votes agreed, 1 abstentions, no one objected. Again, it should be noted that the announcement also stated that "the company supervisors, senior management review the meeting motion." So far, both from the contents of the announcement and the announcement format and other angles to judge, this announcement is a bland listed company board of directors notice. However, on the morning of September 11th, the statement of the Chairman of the Environmental Finance Committee, Wang Yugang, pushed the announcement directly under the spotlight. Wang Yu Gang in a social platform public voice: I as Environmental Resources The chairman of the board of supervisors hereby declares that I have not received the notice of the meeting of the board of directors and the relevant proposal, nor have I reviewed the relevant contents beforehand. The contents of the notice do not conform to the facts. I will initiate the accountability procedure in accordance with the relevant provisions. Subsequently, the "Daily Economic News" reporter linked to Wang Yu Gang. Wang confirmed that the statement was made by me. But for the event more of the situation but do not want to talk more. "Daily Economic News" reporter noted that the announcement mentioned that the company's board of directors of a total of nine people, the actual exercise of the voting rights of six directors, respectively, Mao Fengli, Li Qingyi, Guo interview, Wang Cong, , The Zhang yonghui, , Zheng Jun three did not attend the meeting due to work reasons, nor commissioned other directors on behalf of the vote. On the morning of September 11, Wang Yugang in the social platform to continue to issue a second statement, said to receive the current financial environment, Mr. Zheng Jun, director of the commission, on behalf of his announcement on the day of the statement to the audio-visual. According to the statement, Zheng Jun said, "I Zheng Jun, was informed today that the financial environment held a temporary board of directors notice." According to Zheng Jun's argument, the financial environment has been released after the meeting announcement, it was informed of the meeting notice. And the Zheng Jun commissioned by Wang Yu Gang issued a statement, also referred to the convening of the temporary board of directors need to inform the directors 3 days in advance, and September 11 to see the financial environment announced that the reasons for their work did not participate nor commissioned People to participate in the meeting, which violates the listed company 3 days ahead of the principle of service, with the listed company does not match the statute. Finally, Zheng Jun stressed that "I will vote against. Please correct as soon as possible on September 11 listed companies listed on the new financial executives of the company's voting content." A seemingly plain and brief announcement, was the chairman of the board of supervisors of listed companies, directors have vocalized to prove that the contents of the existence of false statements. For this matter, "Daily Economic News" reporter repeatedly call the company in public information disclosure of several fixed telephone, which is Xuzhou two fixed words in a no answer state, then the area code is located Of a fixed-line successfully connected, but the financial environment of the "Daily Economic News" reporter said that inconvenient to accept the interview, please the formal announcement of listed companies shall prevail. For the announcement "Oolong incident", the lawyer is how to treat it? Lawyer Wang Zhibin lawyer told reporters that the board of directors of the resolution is to hire the financial person in charge, if the company's articles of association without special provisions, the matter belongs to the board of directors to consider the authority, does not require the chairman of the board of directors agreed and reviewed. Notice that the chairman of the board of supervisors has been reviewed, is a violation of information disclosure, does not affect the effectiveness of the resolution. "However, if the notice is not legally notified to the directors to consider, it is a violation of the convening process, the shareholders have the right under the" Company Law "22 provisions require the court to cancel the board resolution.In other words, not a legitimate notice of the directors through On behalf of the shares Rights, there is no direct channel of rights. "Wang Zhibin added. (Intern Liu Yao also has this article ) In the case of